Aim
- To measure the strength of
PL Premium glue using the
standard 1cm x 1cm test on PET plastic.
- To measure the strength of
Sikaflex 11FC glue using the
standard 1cm x 1cm test on PET plastic.
Experiment Setup
The samples were lightly sanded before gluing. The samples
were allowed to fully cure for almost 3 weeks. The standard procedure was used to measure the
strength of the glue. Five samples were tested altogether.
All the samples were prepared exactly the same way. They were
lightly sanded and then pressed them together to make sure all
of the 1 cm square was covered with glue without air pockets.
The samples were not weighted down but just rested on their side
while curing.
|
PL Premium samples on the left and Sikaflex 11
FC on the right |
|
Detail of the clamp used to hold one end of the
sample. |
|
Assembled clamp with one half of the sample. |
|
The other clamp was made from a small desk vice
that was suspended from the ceiling. |
|
Test setup showing the suspended sample. The
second rope is a safety rope to prevent the bottle
from hitting the ground. |
Results
The following results were obtained from the
experiment:
Sample |
Breaking Weight (Kg) |
1 |
9.45 |
2 |
9.8 |
3 |
9.55 |
4 |
9.75 |
5 |
9.9 |
Average |
9.7 |
Sikaflex 11 FC - Breaking weight at failure
Sample |
Breaking Weight (Kg) |
6 |
21.05 |
7 |
30.5 |
8 |
27.25 |
9 |
27.35 |
10 |
26.1 |
Average |
26.45 |
PL Premium - Breaking weight at failure
Images
|
Sikaflex 11FC samples after test. |
|
PL Premium samples after test. |
|
One PL premium sample held all these items
before breaking. |
Conclusions / Analysis
- The Sikaflex results varied a little bit but were pretty
close to the average. The PL varied more in the breaking
strength but on average it held about 2.6 x better than the
Sikaflex 11FC.
- The Sikaflex samples always failed in the glue. They
showed signs that the glue bonded well to the PET plastic
but its own bond strength was ultimately what failed. With
the PL, a number of the samples showed that it was the PET
substrate that failed as it can be seen partially
delaminated.
Observations
- The Sikaflex 11FC could be seen to very slowly yield
when the load was around 80% of the breaking amount. It may
be possible that if the sample was left at the 80% amount
for an extended period of time it may have let go earlier.
The PL showed no sign of this.
- On two occasions the plastic had ripped at the suspended
vice before the PL failed. The sample was gripped again and
the test repeated.
|