last updated: 5th September 2017 - Day 190 - Polaron G3 and Drone Mods

Safety First

Search

Site Index

Tutorials

Articles

Rocket Gallery

Labs

Where To Buy

10 Challenges

Links

Blog

Glossary

Contact Us

About


Construction - Basic

Body

Ring Fins

Flat Fins

Nozzle

Nosecone

Construction - Advanced

Robinson Coupling

Splicing Bottles #1

Splicing Bottles AS#5

Reinforcing Bottles

Side Deploy #1

Side Deploy #2

Mk3 Staging Mechanism

Multi-stage Parachutes

Fairings

Construction - Launchers

Gardena Launcher

Clark Cable-tie

Medium Launcher

Cluster Launcher

Launch Abort Valve

Quick Launcher

How It Works

Drop Away Boosters

Katz Stager Mk2.

Katz Stager Mk3.

DetMech

Dark Shadow Deployment

Articles

Recovery Guide

Parachutes

How Much Water?

Flying Higher

Flying Straight

Building a Launcher

Using Scuba Tanks

Nozzles

Video Taping Tips

MD-80 clone

Making Panoramas

Procedures

Burst Testing

Filling

Launching

Recovery

Flight Computer

Servo Timer II

V1.6

V1.5

V1.4

V1.3, V1.3.1, V1.3.2

V1.2

Deploy Timer 1.1

Project Builds

The Shadow

Shadow II

Inverter

Polaron G2

Dark Shadow

L1ght Shadow

Flight Log Updates

#190 - Polaron G3

#189 - Casual Flights

#188 - Skittles Part #2

#187 - Skittles Part #1

#186 - Level 1 HPR

#185 - Liquids in Zero-G

#184 - More Axion G6

#183 - Axion G6

#182 - Casual Flights

#181 - Acoustic Apogee 2

#180 - Light Shadow

#179 - Stratologger

#178 - Acoustic Apogee 1

#177 - Reefing Chutes

#176 - 10 Years

#175 - NSWRA Events

#174 - Mullaley Launch

#173 - Oobleck Rocket

#172 - Coming Soon

#171 - Measuring Altitude

#170 - How Much Water?

#169 - Windy

#168 - Casual Flights 2

#167 - Casual Flights

#166 - Dark Shadow II

#165 - Liquid Density 2

#164 - Liquid Density 1

#163 - Channel 7 News

#162 - Axion and Polaron

#161 - Fog and Boom

#1 to #160 (Updates)

 

FLIGHT LOG

Each flight log entry usually represents a launch or test day, and describes the events that took place.
Click on an image to view a larger image, and click the browser's BACK button to return back to the page.

 

Day 147 - Descent Rates
Date: 15th June 2014
Location:
Whalan Reserve, NSW, Australia
Conditions:
 Overcast, light rain, strong wind 15-25km/h 15C
Team Members at Event:
 GK, Paul K and John K.

Descent Rates

We always attach the parachute shock cord to the side of our rocket so it comes down sideways in order to increase drag and come down slower, but we've never measured how effective this actually is. So today we carried out a simple experiment by flying the rocket a couple of times suspended horizontally and a couple of times hanging almost vertically.

Experiment Setup

For horizontal descent we attached the shock cord just forward of the center of gravity because on decent the fins provide a certain amount of lift. If we attach the parachute is right at the center of gravity, then the rocket ends up pointing down nose first on the way down. For vertical suspension we attached the parachute right under the deployment mechanism on the nose cone. The rocket doesn't quite hang vertically but is within 10-20 degrees of vertical.


Rocket suspended horizontally
 
Rocket suspended vertically

In all the experiments we used the following:

  • 530mm diameter parachute (parasheet) with a 90mm diameter spill hole. The parachute uses 12 shroud lines.
  • Axion II rocket - 90mm diameter, 1520mm long, weighing 528 grams, with a 9mm nozzle.
  • zLog Mod 6 altimeter for recording entire flight.

Results

Here are the 4 plots of the flights.


Here the flights have been
launch time aligned
 
Here the flights have been descent
 aligned to see the difference in slope

A summary of the four flights along with their averaged descent rates. We measured the average slope of the descent in all four cases

Flight
Number
Water
(mL)
Pressure
(psi)
Rocket Descent Attitude Descent Rate
(feet / s  - m/s)
Altitude
(feet / m)
1 1400 120 Horizontal 16.55 / 5.04 368' / 112
2 1400 110 Vertical 19.33 / 5.89 333' / 101
3 1400 120 Vertical 19.58 / 5.97 379' / 115
4 1400+foam 120 Horizontal 18.33 / 5.59 454' / 138

Notes:

  • The descent rate was calculated by measuring the difference between the altitude shortly after the parachute was fully inflated and the rocket reached stable terminal velocity, and the altitude shortly before landing. We divided this by how long it took to travel between these two altitudes.

  • On flight #2 we decreased the pressure a little to reduce altitude due to the high wind conditions as we didn't want the rocket drifting too far.

  • Due to the high wind conditions on some of the flights there may have been a small vertical component to the wind that increased or decreased the rate of descent.

Conclusion

From these flights we can see that the rocket orientation does make a difference in the descent rate. For this particular rocket and parachute combination when we consider flight 1 and 3 the difference was around 1 m/s (~3 feet/s) or roughly 15% slower.

Calculating the Descent Rate

When we enter the rocket parameters into the descent equation we get an approximate descent rate of 22.8 feet/s. We approximate the drag coefficient of the parachute to be 0.75 and have to de-rate it due to the size of the spill hole. This spill hole will cause the rocket to descend about 10% faster. When we compare it to the actual measured rate, the theoretical descent rate is higher, because the calculation does not take into account the drag induced by the rocket, and only considers the mass as a point.

References

Here is a good website that describes how to calculate the size of a parachute for a desired descent rate.

Parachute Descent Calculations
http://my.execpc.com/~culp/rockets/descent.html

Parachute Recovery Analysis
http://www.ewp.rpi.edu/hartford/users/papers/engr/ernesto/kapust/EP/Other/References%20-%20Rocket/Jon%20Champion%20docs%20from%20JMRC/parachute_recovery_analysis.pdf

The following calculators can be used to work out the descent rate for a particular combination.

Other flights on the day

The day was heavily overcast with at least one light sprinkle. The wind was also quite strong so at times we had to pause and wait for calmer conditions.

We built another rocket with the kids and one of their friends the day before, This one had a 2L spliced pair for the bottom and the top section was made from our regular 90mm bottles. Launch was good but the parachute failed to deploy at apogee, and instead decided to eject at about 2m above the ground but too late to slow the rocket down. The nose was heavily damaged and will need to be replaced. All of the onboard electronics survived except the servo motor which sounds like it has a problem with the gearbox. The onboard video recorded the sound of the servo activating at apogee so everything was working properly up to that point. We used a bigger parachute for this rocket so it is possible that it got snagged somehow, and only came loose when the rocket had enough speed. One contributing factor may have been lack of support between the deployment mechanism and the top bottle. This may have caused the deployment mechanism to move down about 1 cm due to the G forces. We normally use corriflute for the padding under the mechanism to stop that happening but didn't add it this time.


Axion P

Slight mishap

Paul's Pod 2 rocket also made an appearance and was flown on a C6-5. Flight was good up until the shock cord broke on ejection which came a little later than normal. This shock cord was very old and we were expecting it to fail sooner or later.  Rocket sustained only very little damage and will fly again.

This past week we also celebrated our 8th year since the first launch. :)

 

Flight Details

Launch Details
1
Rocket   Axion P
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1800mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   HD Cam #16, AltimeterOne
Altitude / Time   332 feet / 10.2 seconds
Notes   Good launch, parachute failed to deploy properly at apogee, came out 2m above ground. Nosecone damaged.
2
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1400mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   zLog mod 6 altimeter
Altitude / Time   368 feet / 26.2 seconds
Notes   Good flight, Good landing. Rocket mounted horizontally
3
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   110psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1400mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   zLog mod 6 altimeter
Altitude / Time   333 feet / 21.6 seconds
Notes   Good flight, Good landing. Rocket mounted vertically.
4
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1400mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   zLog mod 6 altimeter
Altitude / Time   379 feet / 24.3 seconds
Notes   Good flight, Good landing. Rocket mounted vertically.
5
Rocket   Pod-2
Motor   C6-5
Payload   None
Altitude / Time   ? / ? seconds
Notes   Good launch, shock cord broke on ejection, rocket suffered only minor damage.
6
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1400mL + foam
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   zLog mod 6 altimeter
Altitude / Time   454 feet / 30.8 seconds
Notes   Good flight, Good landing. Rocket mounted horizontally.

 

<< Previous     Back to Top   Next >>



Copyright © 2006-2017 Air Command Water Rockets

Total page hits since 1 Aug 2006:

George Katz - Google Plus