last updated: 20th April 2017 - Day 186 - Light Shadow pyro flights - HPR Level 1 Attempt

Safety First

Search

Site Index

Tutorials

Articles

Rocket Gallery

Labs

Where To Buy

10 Challenges

Links

Blog

Glossary

Contact Us

About


Construction - Basic

Body

Ring Fins

Flat Fins

Nozzle

Nosecone

Construction - Advanced

Robinson Coupling

Splicing Bottles #1

Splicing Bottles AS#5

Reinforcing Bottles

Side Deploy #1

Side Deploy #2

Mk3 Staging Mechanism

Multi-stage Parachutes

Fairings

Construction - Launchers

Gardena Launcher

Clark Cable-tie

Medium Launcher

Cluster Launcher

Launch Abort Valve

Quick Launcher

How It Works

Drop Away Boosters

Katz Stager Mk2.

Katz Stager Mk3.

DetMech

Dark Shadow Deployment

Articles

Recovery Guide

Parachutes

How Much Water?

Flying Higher

Flying Straight

Building a Launcher

Using Scuba Tanks

Nozzles

Video Taping Tips

MD-80 clone

Making Panoramas

Procedures

Burst Testing

Filling

Launching

Recovery

Flight Computer

Servo Timer II

V1.6

V1.5

V1.4

V1.3, V1.3.1, V1.3.2

V1.2

Deploy Timer 1.1

Project Builds

The Shadow

Shadow II

Inverter

Polaron G2

Dark Shadow

L1ght Shadow

Flight Log Updates

#186 - Level 1 HPR

#185 - Liquids in Zero-G

#184 - More Axion G6

#183 - Axion G6

#182 - Casual Flights

#181 - Acoustic Apogee 2

#180 - Light Shadow

#179 - Stratologger

#178 - Acoustic Apogee 1

#177 - Reefing Chutes

#176 - 10 Years

#175 - NSWRA Events

#174 - Mullaley Launch

#173 - Oobleck Rocket

#172 - Coming Soon

#171 - Measuring Altitude

#170 - How Much Water?

#169 - Windy

#168 - Casual Flights 2

#167 - Casual Flights

#166 - Dark Shadow II

#165 - Liquid Density 2

#164 - Liquid Density 1

#163 - Channel 7 News

#162 - Axion and Polaron

#161 - Fog and Boom

#160 - Chasing Rockets

#159 - Measurement

#158 - Dark Shadow

#157 - Polaron G2

#156 - Foam Flights

#155 - Down The Barrel

#154 - Revisits

#153 - ClearCam

#152 - Mullaley, Axion G2

#151 - Competition Day

#1 to #150 (Updates)

 

FLIGHT LOG

Each flight log entry usually represents a launch or test day, and describes the events that took place.
Click on an image to view a larger image, and click the browser's BACK button to return back to the page.

Day 26 - Static Fire Tests
This photo from last week is what prompted us to carry out these tests
Setting up cameras for the experiment.
... and a couple more.
It is a good idea to wear ear protection, as it can be pretty loud.
Firing the rocket by hand.
Following are frames from the slow motion video.
Just prior to launching test #1.
Initial bubble blow-through, extends all the way to the nozzle.
Jet of water from upper bottle creates a lot of bubbles in the lower bottle.
Lots of bubbles causes the spray to widen.
When bubbles reduce then flow from the nozzle improves.
During the air pulse, some remaining water is forced up the sides of the bottle.
The cool fog inside the rocket after a test firing.
Measuring the inside and outside temperatures of the rocket. The thin wire is the thermocouple.
   
   
   
   
   
Date: 24th February 2007      3:00pm - 5:00pm
Location:
Back Yard (site #6)
Conditions:
Overcast. Temp: 22 degrees C.
Rockets:
(click the name for rocket details)
 
Name Capacity Notes
Polaron III 8 L A newer rocket rebuilt from the last launch attempt that failed on the launch pad. Fixed to launcher.

Team Members at Launch Event: PK, GK, AK, John K and Paul K.
Number of firings: 4

Today was a slightly different launch day. After reviewing last weeks photos and videos we noticed that both J4 II and Polaron III exhibited unusual nozzle spray behaviour and in one photo the water in Polaron III appeared cloudy just after takeoff. So we decided to perform some static fire tests to see what was going on.

Flight Day Events

During the week I managed to figure out (well actually read the manual) how to use our digital still camera to record video at 60 frames per second. Because of the faster frame rate it only records at a resolution of 320 x 240 but that was enough for our needs.

We set up Polaron III on the new launcher and tied it down so it wouldn't fly away. We knew that we didn't need to weigh down the launcher, because the rocket's thrust would be pushing against it and therefore providing an equal but opposite reaction force. But we did anyway, just in case Newton was asleep at the wheel on the day.

We set up a few cameras around and did the following experiments:

Static Fire Test #1

We filled the rocket with 2.5 L of water. There was about 600ml was in the top bottle, and about 1.9L in the bottom bottle. With an air gap in the top of the lower bottle.  This water configuration is quite easy to achieve, just pour the water in and let it partially fill the next bottle. As the top bottle is closed off the small Robinson coupling hole mostly keeps the water coming through to the bottom bottle and hence leaving an air gap. The nozzle was a 9mm Gardena nozzle.

Results


Water Rocket Static Fire Test #1


(If the video does not play, try the latest Flash player from Macromedia)

We pulled the hose off the rocket and watched what happens to the water inside the bottle and the corresponding spray from the nozzle. The video clearly shows the jet of water from the top bottle dragging air with it penetrating all the way through the water in the lower bottle. This starts a process of generating a great many bubbles in the water against the nozzle and progresses up the bottle until the entire bottle is filled with bubbles so that it is milky in appearance. The nozzle spray also correspondingly widens the same way as we saw on the last launch day. The air bubbles in the water must be expanding as they exit the nozzle, and hence the wide spray.

After a while when the water runs out in the top bottle and water is only being pushed out of the bottom bottle, the nozzle spray narrows again and the water becomes a little more clear, although the surface is very rough and there is a substantial number of bubbles in it.

As the water is about to run out, the and the air pulse happens, the airspeed inside the rocket increases significantly.  The air flow is such that the remaining water actually gets pushed up the sides of the bottle and is kept there until the air runs out and the water then just drains out of the nozzle. It wasn't a lot of water but it was an unexpected result.

Static Fire Test #2

The second test involved only filling the lower bottle with 1.9L of water so that there was no water in the upper bottle. We used exactly the same pressure as the previous test.

Results

On launch the blow-through also happened, but the blow-through bubble quickly retracted again to the surface and the water stayed relatively bubble free for the duration of the burn. The nozzle spray was also relatively clean.


Water Rocket Static Fire Test #2


(If the video does not play, try the latest Flash player from Macromedia)

The next two tests were used to measure the temperature of the bottles inside and outside as they were filling and just after they emptied. No water was used in these experiments. The ambient temperature was 22 degrees C. All temperatures were measured with a tiny thermocouple connected to multimeter that can measure temperature. The thermocouple can measure rapid changes in temperature.

When measuring the skin temperature we just placed the sensor onto the bottle, but probably should have been shielded from the environment.

Static Fire Test #3

The rocket was filled to 50 psi and the outside skin temperature was measured during filling to be 25 degrees C. +3 above ambient.

When the air was let out, the thermocouple was placed inside the rocket and the air temperature was measured at 16 degrees C. -6 below ambient.


Water Rocket Static Fire Test #3

(If the video does not play, try the latest Flash player from Macromedia)

Static Fire Test #4

The rocket was filled to 100 psi and the outside skin temperature was measured during filling to be 27 degrees C. +5 above ambient.

When the air was let out, the thermocouple was placed inside and the air temperature was measured at 8 degrees C. -14 below ambient.

Lessons learned

  • Our experiment confirmed that the wide water spray observed last week was due to expanding bubbles rather than a faulty nozzle/seal as previously believed.
  • Designing a better coupling might mean that the rocket does not produce this "blow through" and allow the water to come out more evenly and hence more efficiently.
  • Water flows up the sides of the lowest bottle during the air pulse. Minimising this should also allow better flight efficiency.
  • To get a more efficient burn there should not be any water in the upper bottle above the coupling. Water often ends up there if you fill the rocket too quickly with air.
  • The temperature measurements indicated that there is unlikely to be much effect on the PET bottle material with the pressures we regularly use.

Things to consider

If the bubbles are produced in an efficient manner it may be possible to use that to an advantage with an expanding nozzle. Antigravity Research used detergent to create foam inside the rocket with an expanding nozzle to make the rocket more efficient. When perfected a technique based on the static fire test #1 may be used to generate the same effect without the viscosity penalty of using detergent.

If the temperature of the air inside the rocket drops below freezing at higher launch pressures, it may be likely that the during the air pulse tiny water droplets exiting could be freezing and exiting as ice or snow?

Notes

  • These were static tests that do not take into account the acceleration of the rocket, so the water may behave differently, but from last weeks tests we see that even accelerated rockets behaved in a very similar manner.
  • We purposefully recorded the rocket video sideways so that we could see more of the action.

What's Next?

  • We will try to improve the coupling to prevent this "blow-through". We already have a simple idea that may fix this. More on that next time.
  • We will need to do further tests with a different sized nozzles, and bottle capacities and shapes.
  • We may try to get a consistent bubble forming scheme and use an expanding nozzle to see if it makes a measurable difference.

Flight Record

Test Rocket Pressure (PSI) Notes
1 Polaron III 110 With some water in the upper bottle, water in lowest bottle exhibited a significant amount of bubbles which caused the nozzle spray to widen.
2 Polaron III 110 With no water in the top bottle the blow-trough also happened but settled quickly, for an efficient burn.
3 Polaron III 50 Temperatures measured inside and out.
4 Polaron III 100 Temperatures measured inside and out. Higher pressure made a significant difference on the temperature difference.

Notes to Self

  • Wear ear and eye protection when performing tests like this.

<< Previous       Back to top      Next >>



Copyright © 2006-2017 Air Command Water Rockets

Total page hits since 1 Aug 2006:

George Katz - Google Plus