last updated: 5th September 2017 - Day 190 - Polaron G3 and Drone Mods

Safety First

Search

Site Index

Tutorials

Articles

Rocket Gallery

Labs

Where To Buy

10 Challenges

Links

Blog

Glossary

Contact Us

About


Construction - Basic

Body

Ring Fins

Flat Fins

Nozzle

Nosecone

Construction - Advanced

Robinson Coupling

Splicing Bottles #1

Splicing Bottles AS#5

Reinforcing Bottles

Side Deploy #1

Side Deploy #2

Mk3 Staging Mechanism

Multi-stage Parachutes

Fairings

Construction - Launchers

Gardena Launcher

Clark Cable-tie

Medium Launcher

Cluster Launcher

Launch Abort Valve

Quick Launcher

How It Works

Drop Away Boosters

Katz Stager Mk2.

Katz Stager Mk3.

DetMech

Dark Shadow Deployment

Articles

Recovery Guide

Parachutes

How Much Water?

Flying Higher

Flying Straight

Building a Launcher

Using Scuba Tanks

Nozzles

Video Taping Tips

MD-80 clone

Making Panoramas

Procedures

Burst Testing

Filling

Launching

Recovery

Flight Computer

Servo Timer II

V1.6

V1.5

V1.4

V1.3, V1.3.1, V1.3.2

V1.2

Deploy Timer 1.1

Project Builds

The Shadow

Shadow II

Inverter

Polaron G2

Dark Shadow

L1ght Shadow

Flight Log Updates

#190 - Polaron G3

#189 - Casual Flights

#188 - Skittles Part #2

#187 - Skittles Part #1

#186 - Level 1 HPR

#185 - Liquids in Zero-G

#184 - More Axion G6

#183 - Axion G6

#182 - Casual Flights

#181 - Acoustic Apogee 2

#180 - Light Shadow

#179 - Stratologger

#178 - Acoustic Apogee 1

#177 - Reefing Chutes

#176 - 10 Years

#175 - NSWRA Events

#174 - Mullaley Launch

#173 - Oobleck Rocket

#172 - Coming Soon

#171 - Measuring Altitude

#170 - How Much Water?

#169 - Windy

#168 - Casual Flights 2

#167 - Casual Flights

#166 - Dark Shadow II

#165 - Liquid Density 2

#164 - Liquid Density 1

#163 - Channel 7 News

#162 - Axion and Polaron

#161 - Fog and Boom

#1 to #160 (Updates)

 

FLIGHT LOG

Each flight log entry usually represents a launch or test day, and describes the events that took place.
Click on an image to view a larger image, and click the browser's BACK button to return back to the page.

Day 82 - Investigating in flight water behaviour - Part #2
The fins have been painted a neutral gray to assist with the camera's auto-iris. A set of tell-tails have been attached to the fin to observe airflow near the bottom of the rocket.
Launch #1 @ 130psi.
Parachute tangled and the rocket crashed heavily buckling the top two bottles.
Water running out during the boost phase.
At the start of the air-pulse, water is pushed up the sides of the bottle. Seen near the top of the frame.
Starting to fall backwards, and looking out over the NSWRA launch area.
Left over water draining out of the rocket on the way down.
Last flight of the day.
Sikaflex 11FC is used to seal the splice.
@190psi, the bottles are severely distorted. You can see where the strapping tape broke.
Shock wave from the explosion creates a very brief vapour cloud.
Shortly followed by the water from the bottle.
The neighbours don't bother asking anymore about the booms.
You can see some of the Sikaflex still adhering to the edge of the bottle. This did not happen with the epoxy glue.
The splice remained intact. The bottle ripped itself quite cleanly at the sleeve edge.
   
   

Date:  31st October 2009 (8am - 1:00 pm)
Location:
Doonside, NSW, Australia
Conditions:
 Warm 23C. Light winds, overcast
Team Members at Event:
GK and John K.

This week we revisited the experiment carried out on Day 80 while looking back at the bottom part of the rocket during flight. We changed a couple of things in the experiment to make it easier to see what happens in the lowest bottle during flight:

  • We painted the fins a neutral grey to help prevent the camera seeing too much white making everything else dark.
  • We only used coloured water this time instead of foam to help provide a better contrast.

Since one of the fins was going to take up quite a bit of the video frame, we decided to attach a set of 8 tell-tails (in two rows) to see what the airflow is like around the bottom bottle. We weren't looking for any particular result with these, it was more or less out of curiosity.

Flight day report

  • We arrived at the launch site about 8am. Setup was fairly quick and straight forward with no issues.
  • The rocket was pressurised to 130 psi and launched. The flight was straight and stable. The parachute deployed around apogee, but it was quickly obvious that the parachute didn't want to play ball. The parachute became tangled and acted more like a streamer than a parachute. With such a heavy nose, the rocket impacted quite hard into the ground.

    The slow motion video showed how much the boom arms bent during the crash, but sprung back again without problems.

    The nosecone was only slightly damaged, and the top two bottles on the rocket buckled. All important components survived well without problems.
  • The video from on board the rocket was also good.
  • I always bring along spare nosecones and bottles, so it literally took 5 minutes to unscrew the buckled bottles from the rocket, and screw in the new ones. I also configured the new nosecone's flight computer to the correct flight profile settings, and the rocket was ready to go again. It's great having this modular capability in the rockets for events such as this. The only difference was that the new nosecone did not have the extra ballast, so I extended the parachute deploy delay a little.
  • The second flight was similar to the first, but this time the parachute opened well and the rocket landed without incident. Good video of the lowest bottle was obtained.
  • The third flight was again launched at 130 psi as the previous one, and good onboard video was acquired again. The parachute opened a little late than we would have liked.

We only flew the three flights on the day, as we spent a bit of time video taping pyro rockets on the day.

What we learned

Both of the experiment improvements worked well, and the detail of the water was a lot clearer than the last time around.

It was quite obvious from the footage that even under acceleration the water still gets pushed up the sides of the bottle during the air pulse. Some of the water can be seen draining from the rocket while under parachute.

The retained water may only translate to a couple of percent reduced performance, but it is something to consider when designing high performance rockets with Robinson couplings. People optimize the weight of their recovery systems and 20mL of water saved is 20 grams of payload.

The tell-tails showed the airflow quite well along the fins, although I had expected to see the ones closest to the rocket show more of a curvature as the air comes back together near the bottom of the rocket.

It was also interesting to see exactly when the rocket actually started falling backwards after apogee as the tell-tails could be seen lifting. Something that is normally difficult to judge from onboard video of the ground, since the closest reference is at least a couple of hundred feet away.

Splice Experiments ... continued

Since starting the splice testing a couple weeks ago, we've tried the Epoxy and PL splice as well as the Sikaflex and PL splice. Both used the #5 splice arrangement.

Epoxy

After letting the epoxy splice sit for a week we pressurised the spliced-pair and at around 120 psi a small leak developed. We kept increasing the pressure until the splice failed at ~150psi.

It was the PET bottle that failed rather than the splice. It tore itself fairly cleanly from around the edge of the sleeve. The epoxy glue though separated cleanly from the bottle that flew off. This means that the epoxy did not do as good a job of holding onto the PET, even though the 1cm x 1cm tests showed promising results.

The reinforcing shells worked well and the bottles did not show any signs of stress in the neck area.

Sikaflex 11FC

When both the Sikaflex and PL cured we pressure tested the spliced-pair again to destruction. This time the results were a lot more promising. The splice remained sealed during the entire test.

The final burst pressure was 190 psi (13 bar). In the slow motion video you can see the reason for the failure. The glass strapping tape broke over one of the splits in the reinforcing jacket, which resulted in the jacket no longer reinforcing the bottle, and the bottle exploded. Normally these bottles burst around 165psi. It tore itself away from the other bottle in a similar manner as the Epoxy test, but this time you could see traces of glue on both bottles which suggests the Sikaflex was holding well to the PET all the way to the end.

The region around the edge of the splice undergoes quite a bit of stretching, which appears to have helped the epoxy fail, but the Sikaflex being so flexible continued to seal despite the stretching.

The bottle has a cross-sectional area of 9503 mm squared (14.73 square inches) which means that at 190 psi the splice was holding the equivalent of 1,269 kg (2798 pounds) stopping the two bottles from flying away from each other. That's the equivalent of hanging a small family car from the end of the splice!

A little bit of air entered the splice because all the water ran out in the air hose so when the bottle let go there was quite a loud boom. Luckily the neighbours now know that this sort of thing happens on the other side of their fence from time to time and don't bother asking about it anymore.

Before the test I attached a skewer stick to the end of a piece of blue-tack and stuck it on the bottle right next to the sleeve. This was intended to help show the bottle expanding more outside the sleeve than close to the sleeve. In the end it was difficult to tell if there had been significant distortion because there was a wrap of glass tape right next to the sleeve. You can see the distortion more clearly on the other side because the reinforcing tape is further from the sleeve.

Next we will be making up a number of these spliced pairs and test them to 10% over the intended pressure and build a rocket out of them.

Flight Details

Launch Details
1
Rocket   Axion IVd
Pressure   130 psi
Nozzle   9mm
Water   1.4 L
Flight Computer   V1.6 - 4 second delay
Payload   Mini DV cam MD80
Altitude / Time   ? / 8.11 seconds
Notes   Good vertical flight, parachute deployed after apogee but tangled and did not open properly. Nosecone damaged, and the top two bottles were damaged. All electronics survived, and good video was obtained.
2
Rocket   Axion IVd
Pressure   130 psi
Nozzle   9mm
Water   1.4 L
Flight Computer   V1.6 - 4.8 second delay
Payload   Mini DV cam MD80
Altitude / Time   ? / 13.79 seconds
Notes   Good vertical flight. Parachute opened late, but rocket landed well. The nosecone was replaced for this flight and did not have the additional ballast. Good video was obtained.
3
Rocket   Axion IVd
Pressure   130 psi
Nozzle   9mm
Water   1.4 L
Flight Computer   V1.6 - 4.8 second delay
Payload   Mini DV cam MD80
Altitude / Time   ? / 14.25 seconds
Notes   Good vertical flight. Parachute also opened late, but rocket landed well. Good video was obtained. The rocket spun about 1 turn on the way up.

<< Previous       Back to top       Next >>

 



Copyright © 2006-2017 Air Command Water Rockets

Total page hits since 1 Aug 2006:

George Katz - Google Plus