last updated: 16th March 2017 - Day 178 & day 181 Acoustic Apogee Detector

Safety First

Search

Site Index

Tutorials

Articles

Rocket Gallery

Labs

Where To Buy

10 Challenges

Links

Blog

Glossary

Contact Us

About


Construction - Basic

Body

Ring Fins

Flat Fins

Nozzle

Nosecone

Construction - Advanced

Robinson Coupling

Splicing Bottles #1

Splicing Bottles AS#5

Reinforcing Bottles

Side Deploy #1

Side Deploy #2

Mk3 Staging Mechanism

Multi-stage Parachutes

Fairings

Construction - Launchers

Gardena Launcher

Clark Cable-tie

Medium Launcher

Cluster Launcher

Launch Abort Valve

Quick Launcher

How It Works

Drop Away Boosters

Katz Stager Mk2.

Katz Stager Mk3.

DetMech

Dark Shadow Deployment

Articles

Recovery Guide

Parachutes

How Much Water?

Flying Higher

Flying Straight

Building a Launcher

Using Scuba Tanks

Nozzles

Video Taping Tips

MD-80 clone

Making Panoramas

Procedures

Burst Testing

Filling

Launching

Recovery

Flight Computer

Servo Timer II

V1.6

V1.5

V1.4

V1.3, V1.3.1, V1.3.2

V1.2

Deploy Timer 1.1

Project Builds

The Shadow

Shadow II

Inverter

Polaron G2

Dark Shadow

L1ght Shadow

Flight Log Updates

#181 - Acoustic Apogee 2

#180 - Light Shadow

#179 - Stratologger

#178 - Acoustic Apogee 1

#177 - Reefing Chutes

#176 - 10 Years

#175 - NSWRA Events

#174 - Mullaley Launch

#173 - Oobleck Rocket

#172 - Coming Soon

#171 - Measuring Altitude

#170 - How Much Water?

#169 - Windy

#168 - Casual Flights 2

#167 - Casual Flights

#166 - Dark Shadow II

#165 - Liquid Density 2

#164 - Liquid Density 1

#163 - Channel 7 News

#162 - Axion and Polaron

#161 - Fog and Boom

#160 - Chasing Rockets

#159 - Measurement

#158 - Dark Shadow

#157 - Polaron G2

#156 - Foam Flights

#155 - Down The Barrel

#154 - Revisits

#153 - ClearCam

#152 - Mullaley, Axion G2

#151 - Competition Day

#150 - Rocket Salvos

#149 - Glide Fins

#148 - Too Windy

#147 - Descent Rates

#146 - G2 Launcher

#145 - Harness

#144 - Water vs Foam

#143 - Whalan Reserve

#142 - Doonside

#141 - Windy

#1 to #140 (Updates)

 

FLIGHT LOG

Each flight log entry usually represents a launch or test day, and describes the events that took place.
Click on an image to view a larger image, and click the browser's BACK button to return back to the page.

 

Day 143 - Roll Correction, Foam and Whalan Reserve
Date: 9th March 2014
Location:
Whalan Reserve, NSW, Australia
Conditions:
 Partly cloudy, calm to light breeze 5km/h 23C
Team Members at Event:
 Paul K, John K, PK, and GK,

Today we flew our rockets at the new Whalan Reserve launch site. The flight conditions were ideal with very little wind in the morning, We continued flying the roll corrected rocket this week as we wanted to do an aerial survey of the new launch site. The first flight was pressurised to 120psi with just straight water. We didn't put an altimeter on the rocket because we didn't know where it was going to end up and we didn't want to lose the camera and the altimeter. The flight went very well and the rocket landed right next to dad from where he was launching.


Whalan Reserve

 

Setting up for the first launch

Just like X-box in 3D

Close shave

Missed by that much.

The second flight was identical to the first and the rocket again came down close to the pad. On the third flight we added the altimeter to see how high the rocket was going. The flight read out 365' (111m) which was normal for this rocket.

For the fourth flight dad suggested we should add foam to the water, but without the jet foaming spacer. So we added foam and launched the rocket. The rocket again went up straight but this time to 466' (142m). This was considerably higher than we expected. You could see that the air pulse was a lot longer because of the foam that was created while the water was poured in and when the rocket was being pressurised.

On the fifth flight we replaced the bottom of the rocket with a jet foaming configuration. This section comes with its own fins that aren't roll corrected. The section also has 1L less capacity. We also filled the rocket with 1500mL of water and foam. The launch was nice and slow and the rocket arced over in the strengthening wind. It flew to an altitude of 310'. This wasn't unexpected because of the lower capacity and the arced flight path. I also zoomed the slow motion camera on the bottom half of the rocket to see if I could film it in flight. This is always tricky as the rocket is hard to chase. (see video)

On the last flight we set up the first rocket again filled with 1500mL and foam and without the jet foaming configuration. The rocket went up nice and straight and this time it flew to 541' (164m)!. This was surprising as that was another 75 feet higher compared to the previous flight of the same rocket. 

With the rocket not spinning, the video turned out great from all the flights. On flight 3 and 4 we captured the shadow of the rocket on the ground as well as the 'Glory' phenomenon that formed around the rocket's shadow. This is normally due to water droplets in clouds as can be seen from the air in an airplane, but here it was most likely due to the dew droplets on the grass. There was a lot of dew when we arrived at the launch site.


"Come on grandpa, let me
launch it already"

 


 

 

 

 

Interesting Foam Performance

One thing that stood out on the day were flights #4 and #6 and their significantly higher altitudes of 466' and 541' compared to the first 3 flights though the only difference was the addition of bubble bath into the water. All other parameters were the same. At first we thought that perhaps the AltimeterOne may have been giving the wrong readings or adding a bias each flight, but flight #5 showed a lower altitude of 310 feet which looked about right. For each flight we always zero the altimeter just before launch.

The flight time for flight #4 was 35.9s and for #6 it was 49.4s compared to an average of 25.5 seconds for the first three flights without foam further supporting the evidence for the higher altitudes. Lastly the video from onboard the camera also visibly showed that the rocket was higher on those two flights.

The only unconfirmed parameter that may have made a difference is the pressure in that we may have set the pressure regulator to a higher pressure on those two flights. The following day I measured the last pressure setting on the adjustable regulator and it read 130psi when filling a single bottle. The top bottle was also a little more deformed than normal, so it is possible that the last flight was at a higher pressure (hence the higher altitude than #4). Dad though believes the pressure was reading 120psi when he closed the valve, the extra volume of the rocket on the end of the long hose may have had something to do with the reading if air was still flowing into the rocket. We always wind the pressure back to 0 before filling the rocket, so it is very unlikely that both #4 and #6 were at 130psi.

Our current assumption is that flight #4 was at 120psi and flight #6 was at 130psi or close to it. For the next verification launches again comparing water and foam we will set the pressure regulator to one setting and leave it there for all flights to make sure we always have the same pressure.


 

 

 

Industrial area next door

Flying to 541'

Looking back at launcher

Simulations

Running two different simulators for this rocket with parameters:

Capacity: 5.35L (measured)
Nozzle: 9mm
Weight: 544g (includes camera, altimeter, and parachute).
Diameter: 91mm
Water: 1500mL

@120psi gives us an approximate altitude of 354 feet (108m) for Clifford Heath's simulator and 365 feet (111m) for Dean Wheeler's simulator.

These are relatively close to the measured altitude on flight #3 (365') and are also in close agreement to flights from 2 weeks ago of 376' and 363'.

@130psi  we get an estimate of 396' (121m) for Clifford's simulator and 400' (122m) for Dean's.

Flights 4 and 6 significantly deviate from these predictions. They are roughly 20-25% higher!

The rocket's configuration is a spliced-pair on the bottom with a 18mm hole in the tornado tube to a second splice-pair in the middle. This then joins via another tornado tube with a 15mm hole to a 1.25L bottle at the top.

Other observations

  • Just before launch #4 you can see that the foam level reaches up to the top coupling. For the #6 launch you can see that the foam level was half way up the top bottle. There had been some residual foam left in the rocket from the previous flights.

  • The same rocket was used in Doonside two weeks earlier and launched at the same pressure with 1500mL of water only. It gave altitudes of 376' and 363' which is consistent with the first three flights without foam.

  • When we filled the rocket, a lot of the water drained into the top bottle, when we set the rocket up on the pad we had to squeeze the bottle several times to get the water to drain to the lower levels. This likely produced more foam in the rocket.

  • Quite a few years ago there was 1 flight we did (day45) that also showed a significant altitude boost over a previous flight when we added foam.

Sound analysis

 

When we look at the sound produced by the rocket (as heard on the ground), you can get a sense of what's going on with the thrust profile. Here is a comparison of the 5 flights (1,2,3,4 and 6).

Flight 1,2 and 3 only used water, while 4 and 6 had a small amount of kids bubble bath added to the water to make up the same amount by volume.

In the first three you can see a clear distinction in the water and air phases. In flight 4 you can see the extended air phase where the foam is coming out, but you still see both phases.

In flight 6, however, there does not appear to be a clear distinction in the two phases. The overall sound amplitude is also lower than when compared to water alone.

 

Here is a highlights video from the day.

Next launch we will again try to fly some comparison flights between water only and with foam. We had performed some comparison tests several years ago, but those flights used the more restricted Robinson couplings in the rocket construction.

Polaron G2 Updates

We have continued to progress on the G2 as well. Here are some more progress notes and photos on the G2 build log.

Flight Details

Launch Details
1
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9mm
Water   1500mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   HD Cam #16,
Altitude / Time   ' / 22.8 seconds
Notes   Good flight with and good landing. No Roll. Very good video.
2
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1500mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   HD Cam #16
Altitude / Time   ' / 29.3 seconds
Notes   Good flight with very little roll. Good landing.
3
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1500mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   HD Cam #16, AltimeterOne
Altitude / Time   365' / 24.4 seconds
Notes   Good flight with very little roll. Good landing.
4
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1500mL + foam (no jet foaming spacer)
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   HD Cam #16, AltimeterOne
Altitude / Time   466' / 35.9 seconds
Notes   Good flight with very little roll. Good landing.
5
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1500mL + foam, jet foaming spacer
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   HD Cam #16, AltimeterOne
Altitude / Time   310' / 22.3 seconds
Notes   Good flight with rocket arcing over. Good landing.
6
Rocket   Axion II
Pressure   120psi (130psi?)
Nozzle   9 mm
Water   1500mL
Flight Computer   ST II - 5 seconds
Payload   HD Cam #16, AltimeterOne
Altitude / Time   541' / 49.4 seconds
Notes   Very good flight with very little roll. Excellent altitude. Good landing although it just missed the tree.

 

<< Previous    Back to Top   Next >>



Copyright © 2006-2017 Air Command Water Rockets

Total page hits since 1 Aug 2006:

George Katz - Google Plus